🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.